Overview
keeping preclusion of class action suits doesn’t make contract unconscionable
Summary with this instance from Cunningham v. Citigroup
Opinion
Appeal through the Superior Court, Law Division, Union County.
Before Judges KESTIN, LEFELT and FALCONE.
Donna Siegel Moffa argued the reason for appellant (Williams, Cuker and Berezofsky and Trujillo Rodriguez Richards, lawyers; Mark R. Cuker and Ms. Moffa, in the brief).
Marc J. Zucker argued the main cause for the respondent County Bank (Weir Partners solicitors; Susan Verbonitz and Mr. Zucker, regarding the brief).
Claudia T. Callaway (Paul, Hastings, Janofsky Walker)of the District of Columbia Bar, admitted pro vice that is hac argued the main cause for respondent Main Street provider Corp. (Sweeney Sheehan, and Ms. Callaway, attorneys; Ms. Callaway of counsel; J. Michael Kunsch, in the brief).
Pinilis Halpern, solicitors for amicus curiae AARP Foundation and Counsel for nationwide Association of Consumer Advocates (William J. Pinilis, of counsel as well as on the brief).
The opinion associated with court had been delivered by
The major concern presented in this interlocutory appeal, and something that are of very very very first impression in this State, is whether a mandatory arbitration supply in a quick payday loan agreement is enforceable. Fortsätt läsa ”Plaintiff finished and came back the mortgage application by facsimile, looking for a $100 loan”